A Quick System-Check for Indian Universities
(Part-2
of the series: Leadership and Management of Institutions of Higher
Education)
In an era when intellectual capital is increasingly
prized, both for individuals and for the nation, education beyond school has
never been more important. Ninety percent of the fastest-growing jobs in the
new knowledge-driven economy will require some post-school education.
Among the vast and varied institutions that make up the
Indian higher education, there is undoubtedly much to applaud but also much
that requires urgent reform. Institutions for higher education have
accomplished much in terms of expansion and enrolments of which they and the
country can be proud. Despite these achievements, however, Indian higher
education needs to improve in dramatic ways. It is time to be frank and not be
blind to the less inspiring realities of higher education in our country.
There is nothing about our higher education that would
make it the envy of the world. It is quite acceptable that some who care deeply
about higher education may not easily acknowledge this diagnosis.
Enrolment
Enrolment to higher education is unduly limited by the
complex interplay of inadequate preparation, lack of information about college
opportunities, and persistent financial barriers.
Substandard high school preparation is compounded by
poor alignment between high schools and colleges, which often creates an
“expectations gap” between what colleges require and what high schools produce.
Shortcomings in high schools mean that an unacceptable number of college
students must take costly remedial classes. Among students who do make it on to
college education, a troubling number waste time and the hard earned money of
their family in mastering English and Math skills that they should have learned
in high school. The evidence is in the mushrooming of the coaching centres for
all kinds of MBA entrance examinations.
While better high-school preparation is imperative,
admitted students and colleges themselves must jointly take responsibility for
academic success.
Some students are lost right in the high schools, which
do not yet see preparing all pupils for higher education and training as their
responsibility. Others don’t enter college because of inadequate information
and rising costs, combined with a confusing financial support system that
spends too little on those who need help the most.
Improving the information about college available to
students and reducing financial barriers to attendance, which is further
addressed below under discussion of affordability, are also crucial to
improving enrolment.
But
even the economic benefits of a college degree could diminish if students don’t
acquire the appropriate skills.
Cost
and Affordability
Compounding all of these difficulties is a lack of
clear, reliable information about the cost and quality of these institutions,
along with a remarkable absence of accountability mechanisms to ensure that
colleges succeed in educating students.
The cost of attending college is not limited to just
the tuition fee but includes costs of commuting and travel, living and
sustenance, boarding and lodging, consumables and books, socialising and
entertainment and conformance to the peer group. There is seemingly an
inexorable increase in college costs, which have outpaced inflation for the
past two decades and have made affordability an ever-growing worry for
students, families, and policymakers. Too many students are either discouraged
from attending college by rising costs, or take on worrisome debt burdens in
order to do so.
While students bear the immediate brunt of tuition
increases, affordability is also a crucial policy dilemma for those who fund
higher education. Even as institutional costs go up, in recent years state
subsidies have decreased on a per capita basis and public concern about
affordability may eventually contribute to an erosion of confidence in higher
education. Affordability is directly affected by a financing system that
provides limited incentives for universities to take aggressive steps to
improve institutional efficiency and productivity.
To improve affordability, there needs to be a focused
program of cost-cutting and productivity improvements in the institutions.
Higher education institutions should improve institutional cost management
through the development of new performance benchmarks, while also lowering
per-student educational costs. (See an earlier post from me: P&L Duty of Universities is in National Interest)
Financial
Assistance
Our financial assistance system is confusing, complex,
inefficient, duplicative, and frequently does not direct aid to students who
truly need it. There is a multiplicity of schemes providing direct financial
aid or tax benefits to individuals pursuing higher education. Moreover, the
current system does not provide definitive information about the approval of
grant of aid until the middle of the year of college, which makes it hard for
families to plan and discourages college attendance. Unmet financial need is a
growing problem for students from low-income families, who need aid the most.
The current maze of financial assistance schemes, rules
and regulations needs a serious review. We need a system more in line with
student needs and national priorities. That effort would require a significant
increase in need-based financial aid and a complete restructuring of the
current aid system.
Faculty
Resources
While there is no dearth of bright people who are
knowledgeable in the front areas of higher education, not all of them can
impart their knowledge to intending students in a formal sense. While the
reasons for this could historically lie in our social system where people opted
to become teachers when they could not find job anywhere else thus lowering the
quality of output as well as demeaning the profession, the same would apply
less to higher education. Yet, not many good teachers have become teachers because
the profession failed to offer job satisfaction, personal growth and economic
rewards.
With the economy on the upswing, the opportunities in
sectors other than education are more and better for the better educated
people. There seems to be a trend for people from academics moving over to
greener pastures in business and industry. Those who are staying back
definitely want that the disparities be reduced. All this amounts to hefty
increases in the costs incurred by the institutions in sustaining faculty
resources.
Learning
There are disturbing reports that many students who do
earn degrees have not actually mastered the reading, writing, and thinking
skills expected of college graduates. Over the past decade, literacy among
college graduates has actually declined. The evidence shows that the quality of
student learning at Indian colleges and
universities is inadequate and, in some cases, declining. A number of
recent studies highlight the
shortcomings of higher education institutions in everything from graduation
rates and time to degree to learning outcomes and even core literacy skills.
Unacceptable numbers of college graduates enter the
workforce without the skills employers say they need. These shortcomings have
real-world consequences. Employers report repeatedly that many new graduates
they hire are not prepared to work, lacking the critical thinking, writing and
problem-solving skills needed in today’s workplaces.
Transparency
and Accountability
There is a remarkable shortage of clear, accessible
information about crucial aspects of Indian colleges and universities, from
financial aid to graduation rates. Because data systems are so limited and
inadequate, it is hard for policymakers to obtain reliable information on
students’ progress through the educational pipeline. This lack of useful data
and accountability hinders policymakers and the public from making informed
decisions and prevents higher education from demonstrating its contribution to
the public good.
Universities must become more transparent about cost,
price, and student success outcomes, and must willingly share this information
with students and families. Student achievement, which is inextricably
connected to institutional success, must be measured by institutions on a
“value-added” basis that takes into account students’ academic baseline when
assessing their results.
Innovation
Too many of our universities have not embraced
opportunities to be entrepreneurial, from testing new methods of teaching and
content delivery to meeting the increased demand for lifelong learning. For
their part, state and national policymakers have also failed to make supporting
innovation a priority. Accreditation supports adherence to norms.
There are numerous barriers to investment in
innovation-risk hampering the ability of educational institutions to address
national workforce needs and compete in the global marketplace. Too many of our
universities have not embraced opportunities to be entrepreneurial, from
testing new methods of teaching to providing
logistical support for lifelong
learning and by failing to craft flexible credit-transfer systems that
allow students to move easily between different kinds of institutions.
India’s universities need to embrace a culture of
continuous innovation and quality improvement. These institutions need to
develop new pedagogies, curricula and technologies to improve learning,
particularly in the areas of science and mathematics.
Inspiration
for this System-Check
There would be some serious and inevitable questions
and concerns that may be raised by all those who care for the Indian Higher
Education system. These comments could be an agenda for their debate and
discussion that could well turn into “A National Dialogue.” Through such a
debate, it is our belief that important changes would follow. The result would
be institutions and programs that are more nimble, more efficient, and more
effective. What the nation would gain is a heightened capacity to compete in
the global marketplace. What individuals would gain is full access to
educational opportunities that allow them to be lifelong learners, productive
workers, and engaged citizens.
-------
This is Part-2 of the series: Leadership and
Management of Institutions of Higher Education
Part-3 of the series follows soon
-------
Already
published- Part-1: Setting Priorities for Indian Universities
-------
Labels: HigherEd, National Policy
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home