Monday 27 November 2017

Social Networks Are Not For Professional Networking





Frequently, people take the “Social Butterfly” approach, attempting to casually meet as many persons as possible as if to win the LinkedIn connections and Facebook friends “competition.” They do not spend time and make attempts to develop deeper relationships with select individuals on Social Networking sites.

For professional networking, social media may not be the best and effective approach. Its emphasis is on web of “friends” which does not translate into quality relationships for professional opportunities. 


Post Script (added on 07 Dec 2017):

The above post was made on Blogger, FaceBook, Wordpress and Linkedin.

It caught the attention of Rohit K Sharma of IBM who follows all of my posts on LinkedIn quite carefully. I could not have ignored his comment. Rohit drew my attention to the research of Mark S. Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties" American Journal of Sociology 78, no. 6 (May, 1973): 1360-1380. It is worthwhile to capture the essence of the discussion for enriching the above posting.

The article in question states that ‘weak ties’ can provide information. Strength of ties was articulated as an Intuitive probable notion comprising of 4 dimensions/parameters that the author conjectured to be highly inter-correlated. He had left the notion to be subjected to analytical proof for later work. Thus, he worked on only the first of the four dimensions and used anecdotal data to draw a conjecture.

I also referred to subsequent work, Mark Granovetter:The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Winter, 2005), pp. 33-50. On page 34 he writes, 

          “2) The Strength of Weak Ties. More novel information flows to individuals through weak than through strong ties. Because our close friends tend to move in the same circles that we do, the information they receive overlaps considerably with what we already know. Acquaintances, by contrast, know people that we do not and, thus, receive more novel information. This outcome arises in part because our acquaintances are typically less similar to us than close friends, and in part because they spend less time with us. Moving in different circles from ours, they connect us to a wider world. They may therefore be better sources when we need to go beyond what our own group knows, as in finding a new job or obtaining a scarce service. This is so even though close friends may be more interested than acquaintances in helping us; social structure can dominate motivation. This is one aspect of what I have called "the strength of weak ties" (Granovetter, 1973, 1983).”

As an interesting follow up to the 1973 article, I found an interesting debate: “Gans on Granovetter’s “Strength of Weak Ties” in the same The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 80, No. 2, (Sep. 1974), pp. 524-527.

Information about an opportunity is a precursor to availing it but information is not the opportunity by itself; more particularly; in today’s information overloaded world as in contrast to the information hungry world of 1973 when Mark Granovetter wrote his article. Networks do not have a head or a tail. They do not even have a centre. This applies to both social networks and professional networks. Professional Networks however, have stratification and loose hierarchies of sub-networks.

The conclusion that can be drawn is that social networks may provide information about professional opportunities but that is in no way a negation of my position on the inadequacy of social networks to offer quality relationships for professional opportunities.
 

Labels:

Tuesday 14 November 2017

Murdering My Self-Esteem


Finger-prints are collected as part of biometric data bases for issuance of identity documents like passport and AADHAR. While passport is a proof of identity and citizenship, AADHAR is only a proof of identity.

Some countries collect finger prints from non-citizens before issuing them permission (Visas) to visit that country.

Finger printing is also done by the investigation agencies for corroborating evidence against an accused.

For the last few days, my mobile telephone service provider has been sending a message asking me to REPORT to one of their shops, share my AADHAR number with their EXECUTIVE (?), give my finger prints (to UN-SPECIFIED PERSON?), and confirm the OTP sent on my phone. I must do this in order to receive continued services.

Clearly, the threat being given is that if I don't comply, my mobile service shall be discontinued.

The mobile numbers collected at different places are sold for making unsolicited pesky sales calls.  The DND (Do Not Disturb) registration doesn't work. There is more than one example where even the AADHAR database has been breached.

What are the chances that my finger prints will be sold to be misused on finger-print readers at attendance/entry points or compromising my laptop and mobile phone? What is the safeguard that my finger prints will not be sold and may be found planted at scenes of crime in future?

Who is this person collecting my finger-prints and under what authority. Would he give his finger prints to me and his AADHAR number before he collects mine? I need this for my sense of safety.

Am I accused of some crime that I have to be finger-printed?  Do I have to be finger-printed to use a mobile phone? What are the other services for which I will be finger-printed if I need to avail them?

This direction kills my sense of self-worth. May be I will preserve my self-worth and give up the mobile phone. Coming to think of it, I lived without a mobile phone until the last century. I did not even have a landline until 1997 having waited for a connection under OYT for over 5-years. And life had lesser anxieties and tensions.

May be I will be fine with a landline connection or even without it if the phone-booths will come up once again – which I am sure would, if more people choose self-esteem over a mobile phone.

-------

The contents are cross-posted on Blogger (https://intheworldofideas.blogspot.in/) Facebook (https://facebook.com/intheworldofideas/), Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukul-gupta-69525391/)  Wordpress (https://intheworldofideasblog.wordpress.com/) and FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/ProfMukulGupta) by the author.

The author cannot take any responsibility for comments and activity by readers.

--------

I invite you to follow me on
Twitter: @ProfMukulGupta
Facebook: ProfMukulGupta and
LinkedIn: profmukulgupta

Labels:

Monday 6 November 2017

A Unique Bar Code for Every Indian – An Idea of 1999



Most of us are familiar with Barcodes. A barcode is an optical, machine-readable, representation of data; the data usually describes something about the object that carries the barcode. There are two standards for barcodes – EAN (European Article Number) and UPC (Universal Product Code).

A meeting was held at International Management Institute, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi on 24 February 1999 at the initiative of Mr. Ravi Mathur, CEO, EAN India which I had the opportunity to attend along with my colleague Dr Pradip K Bhaumik.

As a Not-for-Profit initiative of the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, EAN-India had the mandate to represent EAN-International in India and to popularise the use of bar codes and EDI in India Business processes. This meeting led us to conduct a small consulting assignment for EAN India titled "Supply Chains for Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Products" which was completed in October 1999.

During the meeting, I came up with the IDEA OF ASSIGNING A UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION BAR CODE TO EVERY INDIAN which would help the government in increasing the efficiency of supply chains related to public distribution system tremendously.

Mr. Mathur reacted by telling me that both EAN and UPC were morally and ethically against bar-coding human beings. EAN and UPC were willing to provide unique codes to all physical things, animate or inanimate, EXCEPT human beings. Things are changing now. US is debating "Human Bar Coding" (http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/543137/bar-code-for-humans)

Just a coincidence that Mr. Nandan Nilekani published "Imagining India: Ideas for the New Century" in 2008 and was invited to set up The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) in 2009. Isn't AADHAR the same thing?

-------

The contents are cross-posted on Blogger (https://intheworldofideas.blogspot.in/) Facebook (https://facebook.com/intheworldofideas/), Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukul-gupta-69525391/)  Wordpress (https://intheworldofideasblog.wordpress.com/) and FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/ProfMukulGupta) by the author.

The author cannot take any responsibility for comments and activity by readers.

--------

I invite you to follow me on
Twitter: @ProfMukulGupta
Facebook: ProfMukulGupta and
LinkedIn: profmukulgupta

Labels:

Saturday 4 November 2017

Affirmative Action and Reservation


I have no quarrels with the idea of affirmative action. I have disagreement with the basis and quantum of reservations.

If personal taxation is based on economic criteria, the same should be the basis for reservations. Conversely, how about personal taxation based on caste? Does that not sound too insensible? How about religion based taxation, a higher order idiocy.

Why are reservations not followed across the board in all public opportunities?

Caste based reservation only highlights and perpetuates the caste system. The inter-caste social tensions will only increase.

Reservation running at 50 percent means that non SC/ST/OBCs can at best get access to only 50% opportunities which may go up in some cases where SC/ST/OBCs choose not to avail of their claims.

The gender based affirmative action is a pipe dream.

------------

The contents are cross-posted on Blogger (https://intheworldofideas.blogspot.in/) Facebook (https://facebook.com/intheworldofideas/), Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukul-gupta-69525391/)  Wordpress (https://intheworldofideasblog.wordpress.com/) and FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/ProfMukulGupta) by the author.

The author cannot take any responsibility for comments and activity by readers.
--------------

I invite you to follow me on
Twitter: @ProfMukulGupta
Facebook: ProfMukulGupta and
LinkedIn: profmukulgupta

Labels: , , ,

Thursday 2 November 2017

Reinventing Management Education


Since the liberalization of the Indian Economy 25 years back, wide varieties of economic and competitive forces have directly impacted the Indian business schools. Many of these forces that have distressed the business schools are external influences. The business schools cannot be blamed for the onset of the many disruptions— like, changes in regulatory systems and processes, new market entrants, globalization, and technological shifts— that continue even today. Business schools could have been more perceptive in anticipating these trends. Many institutions were far too risk-averse to respond, and those that did respond did so as a halfhearted reaction.

Business schools are devoted to a conventional approach to management education, which reflects historical conventions associated with higher education in general. Many of these conventions bamboozle innovations. Traditional curriculum, pedagogies and legacies prevail. Business schools continue to focus on what they know best and what had worked previously, instead of focusing on the markets they are seeking to serve.

The conventional narrative of the market place as comprising of a Leader, Challengers, Followers and Niche-players has been rewritten as incumbency versus disruption. As incumbent institutions, it makes little sense for business schools to attempt to become disruptors. However, if they want to ensure their long-term survival, business schools will need to revisit the Input-Process-Output model of education.

Current Scenario of Management Education

The economic crisis of 2008 seems to be over and the applications for MBA/PGDM are once again rising. The society and the government no longer dispute or question the role of business in economic affairs and global progress. There are about 10000 business schools around the world and about one-fifth of the world's students are studying business and management. Unprecedented possibilities exist for developing new products, services and solutions as business. Millennials and older students are bitten by the bug of entrepreneurialism and eager to start innovative new companies. Some of this entrepreneurialism is devoted to global transformation - social entrepreneurship, students and their faculty are innovating new solutions to help erase poverty, teach skills to the uneducated, empower women, expand and improve healthcare, and more.

Forces and challenges before Management Education

Some anti-progress forces which are as much anti-state as they are anti-business are emerging. They will sooner or later impact the society and government and consequently they will affect business and business-education.

Globalisation and automation are weakening the position of ordinary citizens who are facing overlapping challenges of unemployment, low income, insecurity, instability and vulnerability. People are associating globalisation with lost industrial glory, lost full-time jobs and weakened social identity. These people want to return to the past era of protectionism and swadeshi. Extreme inequality is spreading globally. The repercussions on society of the current mega-inequality risk creating a domino effect that counters progress.

The education at the school level is unable to keep up with the changing times. School has become a place for skills training; losing sight of the need for a broad education that produces responsible citizens. There is a glaring failure to educate youth and adults in critical thinking which in turn is creating a social milieu science is doubted and questioned; art, literature and music are disrespected; and where propaganda and disinformation overtake true freedom of thought.

There is an increase in terrorism, the UN is unable to solve conflicts, dictatorships and increasingly authoritarian regimes are emerging who are engaging in "hybrid warfare" to avoid attribution or retribution.

The world is apparently facing unstoppable global warming and the rising pollution of the planet's natural resources. These conditions also provide fertile ground for social unrest.

Input-Process-Output Model

Business schools would need to begin from the 'Output' – the graduate who is required to be fit for the new business realities – which the business school ought to deliver. Next they would need to understand the 'Input' – the student entering the business school, in terms of his/her prior learning, motivations, capabilities, aspirations, expectations and constraints. It is only then that the business schools would define the process of education that they should follow to work with the available "Input" with the purpose of delivering the "Output."

Understanding 'Output'

The demands of today's global marketplace, defined by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA principles) demand a new set of skills and abilities. Traditional models of leadership as defined by stability, cyclicality and predictability are no more valid. The evolving context for leadership is focused on technology, globalization, climate change and sustainability. Beyond the capacity to solve linear cause and effect problems, more contemporary leadership skills like discernment and adaptive navigation in real time and dealing with non-linear cause and effect is the order of the day.

Appreciating 'Input'

The students and learners entering a business school are increasingly selective, mobile and technologically savvy. They seek rewards in terms of placements, career shifts and new-networks and not necessarily in terms of education and knowledge. Many students are increasingly going to demand access to management education in the form of online and blended programs, elasticity to accumulate credits and flexible staged certification. This is especially critical for working professional students who wish to avoid paying the often exorbitant opportunity costs associated with leaving their jobs for traditional full-time programs.

Reengineering the 'Process'

If business is to be the agent to transform the world and contribute to solving humanity's most critical problems, Management Education must play a main role in creating our collective future. The very essence of the academic enterprise, the curriculum need to be modified to include –
  • Solutions to boost the currently hopeless citizens into participating in economic growth and wealth;
  • Designing of equitable and fair trade agreements and combat the myopic anti-trade and anti-globalisation forces;
  • Methods for combating the ignorance of anti-intellectualism, which has reactionary beliefs at its core;
  • Portfolio of approaches to solve the wealth inequality challenge that is worsening year by year in many countries; and  
  • Ways to inspire the business world to participate in balancing out the many types of asymmetry on the planet.

Curricula and related activities have historically been the sole domain of the faculty. Business schools that cling to this worldview will do so at their peril.

Most business schools can't accomplish this on their own. They need to create reciprocal, mutually beneficial collaborations with critical private-sector partners. Partnerships with private-sector entities would go beyond the standard internship, full-time placement and academic project support.

Co-creating, co-branding and co-delivering programmes and curricular activities represent the next frontier of engagement between schools and colleges of business and their private-sector partners.

The need for business schools to adapt their processes and to recalibrate their approach to ensuring success of their students is imperative. The near commoditization of the management education industry makes it difficult for students and employers to discern the difference between many of the programs.

No defined 'processes' for a defined 'purpose' can work without 'people.' The biggest challenge in reinventing the management education will be the resistance from the incumbent faculty and the shortage of new and disruptive faculty.


-o-



The contents are cross-posted on Blogger (https://intheworldofideas.blogspot.in/) Facebook (https://facebook.com/intheworldofideas/), Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukul-gupta-69525391/)  Wordpress (https://intheworldofideasblog.wordpress.com/) and FaceBook (https://www.facebook.com/ProfMukulGupta) by the author.

------

Labels: